WATT, JAMES, one of the most illustrious men of his time as a natural
philosopher, chemist, and civil engineer, was born at Greenock, on the 19th of
January, 1736. His father, James
Watt, was a block-maker and ship chandler, and for some time one of the magistrates
of Greenock; and his mother, Agnes Muirhead, was descended from a respectable
family. During boyhood his health was very delicate, so that his attendance at
school was by no means regular; nevertheless, by assiduous application at home,
he soon attained great proficiency in reading, writing, and arithmetic; and, by
the perusal of books that came within his command, he extended his knowledge
beyond the circle of elementary instruction of the public schools, and
cherished that thirst for information which is the characteristic of all men of
genius, and for which he was throughout life remarkable. An anecdote of his
boyhood has been preserved, showing the early bent of his mind. His aunt, Mrs.
Muirhead, sitting with him one evening at the tea-table, said, "James, I
never saw such an idle boy! Take a book, or employ yourself usefully; for the
last half hour you have not spoken a word, but taken off the lid of that
kettle, and put it on again." With the aid alternately of a cup and a
silver spoon, he was observing how the steam rose from the spout and became
condensed, and was counting drops of water. But there is little incident in his
life until he reached his eighteenth year, excepting that he manifested a
strong predilection for mechanical and mathematical pursuits. In accordance
with this natural bent, he departed for London, in 1754, in order to learn the
profession of a mathematical instrument-maker. When he arrived in London, he
placed himself under the direction of a mathematical instrument-maker, and
applied himself with great assiduity, and with such success, that, although he
was obliged, from want of health, to return to his fatherÕs roof in little more
than a year, yet he persevered, and soon attained proficiency in his business.
He made occasional visits to his motherÕs relations in Glasgow, a city at that
time considerably advanced in that career of manufacturing industry and
opulence, for which it has in more recent times been so eminently
distinguished. In that city, it was his intention to settle as a mathematical
instrument-maker; but he was violently opposed by some corporations of the
trades, who viewed him as an intruder upon their privileges, although the
business which he intended to follow, was at that time little practised in Scotland.
By this occurrence, the hopes of Watt had been well nigh frustrated, and the
energies of his inventive mind had probably been turned in a different channel
from that which distinguished his future years, had it not been for the kind
and well directed patronage of the professors of the university. In the year
1757, this learned body, who had at that time to reckon among their number some
of the greatest men then living--Smith, the political economist, Black, the
chemist, and Simson, the geometer--conferred upon Watt the title of
mathematical instrument-maker to the university, with all the privileges of
that office, and chambers within the waIls of their venerable seminary,
adjoining the apartments occupied by the celebrated printers, the Messrs Foulis.
He continued to prosecute his avocation in this place for about six years,
during which time, so far as health and necessary employment would permit, he
applied himself to the acquisition of scientific knowledge. It was during this
period, also, that he contracted a lasting friendship with Dr Black, whose name
will ever be conspicuous in the history of philosophy, for his valuable
additions to our knowledge of the doctrine of heat; and also with Robison, then
a student in Glasgow college, and who afterwards filled the natural philosophy
chair in the university of Edinburgh.
This period of WattÕs life was marked by an
incident, which in itself might appear trifling, and not at all out of the
course of his ordinary business, but which was nevertheless productive of
results, that not only gave immortality to his name, but impressed a great and
lasting change on the commerce and manners of his own country, and also of a
great portion of the world. We here allude to a circumstance that shall shortly
be mentioned, that led to the improvements of Watt on the steam engine; and the
events of his life are so intimately interwoven with the history of the
perfection of this extraordinary machine, that it will be necessary, in a brief
and popular way, to describe the leading principles of its action.
The steam engine, at the time of which we speak,
was constructed after the plan invented by Newcomen. The chief use to which
these engines were applied, was the pumping of water from coal mines, one end
of the pump rod being attached to a long lever, or beam supported in the
middle. To the other end of this lever was attached the rod of a piston,
capable of moving up and down in a cylinder, after the manner of a common
syringe. The weight of the pump rod, &c., at the one end of the beam,
having caused that end to descend, the other end was necessarily raised, and,
the piston rising in the cylinder, steam was admitted from the bottom to fill
the vacuity. But when the piston arrived at the top, cold water was injected at
the bottom, and by reducing the temperature of the steam, condensed it, forming
a vacuum. In this state of things, the atmosphere pressing on the top of the
piston, forced it down, and raised the pump rod at the other end of the beam.
This operation being continued, the pumping of the mine was carried on. Such
was the form of the steam engine, when Watt first found it; and such is its
construction at many coal mines even in our own day, where the economy of fuel
is not a matter of any importance.
Anderson, the professor of natural philosophy, in
the course of the winter of 1763, sent a model of NewcomenÕs engine to Mr Watt
in order to be repaired. This was accordingly done, and the model set in
operation, and with this an ordinary mechanic would have been satisfied. But
the mind of the young engineer had two years before this time been occupied in
researches into the properties of steam. During the winter of 1761, he made
several very simple yet decisive experiments, for the most part with
apothecariesÕ phials, by which he found that a cubic inch of water will form a cubic foot of steam, equal
in elasticity to the pressure of the atmosphere, and also that when a cubic
foot of steam is condensed by injecting cold water, as much heat is given out
as would raise six cubic inches of water to the boiling point. To these
important discoveries in the theory of steam, he subsequently added a third,
beautifully simple, as all philosophical truths are, and valuable from its
extensive application to practical purposes: he found that the latent heat of
steam decreases as the sensible heat increases, and that universally these two
added together make a constant quantity which is the same for all temperatures.
This matter is commonly misrepresented, and it is stated not only in accounts
of the steam engine, but also in memoirs of Mr Watt, that the discoveries of Dr
Black regarding the properties of heat and steam laid the foundation of all
WattÕs inventions. Dr Black himself gave a correct statement of the matter, and
frequently mentioned with great candour, that Mr Watt discovered unaided the
latent heat of steam, and having communicated this to the doctor, that great
chemist was agreeably surprised at this confirmation of the theory he had
already formed, and explained that theory to Mr Watt; a theory which was not
made public before the year 1762. During the same year Watt made some
experiments with a PapinÕs digester, causing the piston of a syringe to move up
and down by the force of steam of high temperature, on the principle of the
high pressure engine, now employed for various purposes. But he gave up the
idea from fear of bursting the boiler, and the difficulty of making tight
joints. These facts are sufficient to prove that he had at this time some idea
of improving the steam engine; and he himself modestly says, "My attention
was first directed in 1759, to the subject of steam engines by Dr Robison, then
a student in the university of Glasgow, and nearly of my own age. Robison at
that time threw out the idea of applying the power of the steam engine to the
moving of wheel carriages and to other purposes; but the scheme was not
matured, and was soon abandoned on his going abroad." His active mind,
thus prepared, was not likely to allow the defects of the model which was put
in his hands to pass unobserved. This interesting model, which is still
preserved among the apparatus of the Glasgow university, has a cylinder whose
diameter is two inches, the length of stroke being six. Having repaired it, he
tried to set it a-going, the steam being formed in a spherical boiler whose
diameter was about nine inches. In the course of these trials he found the quantity of steam, as
likewise that of the cold injection water, to be far greater in proportion,
than what he understood was required for engines of a larger size. This great
waste of steam, and consequently fuel, he endeavoured to remedy by forming
cylinders of bad conductors of heat, such as wood saturated with oil, but this
had not the desired effect. At last the fact occurred to him, that the cylinder
was never sufficiently cooled down in order to obtain a complete vacuum. For
some time before this it had been found by Dr Cullen that under diminished
pressure there is a corresponding fall of the boiling point. It now became
necessary to ascertain the relation which the boiling point bears to the
pressure on the surface of the water. He was not possessed of the necessary
instruments to try the boiling points under pressures less than that of the
atmosphere, but having tried numerous points under increased pressures, he laid
down a curve whose ordinates represented the pressures and abscissas the
corresponding boiling points, and thus discovered the equation of the boiling
point. These considerations led Watt, after much reflection, to the true method
of overcoming the difficulties in the operation of NewcomenÕs engine. The two
things to be effected were, 1st, to keep the cylinder always as hot as the
steam to be admitted into it, and secondly, to cool down the condensed steam
and the injection water used for condensation to a temperature not exceeding
100 degrees. It was early in the summer of l765 that the method of
accomplishing these two objects was first matured in his mind. It then occurred
to him that if a communication were opened between a cylinder containing steam
and another vessel exhausted of air and other fluids, the steam would
immediately rush into the empty vessel, and continue so to do until an
equilibrium was established, and by keeping that vessel very cool the steam would
continue to enter and be condensed. A difficulty still remained to be overcome,
how was the condensed steam and injection water, together with the air, which
must necessarily accompany, to be withdrawn from the condensing vessel. Watt
thought of two methods, one by a long pipe, sunk into the earth, and the other
by employing a pump, wrought by the engine itself; the latter was adopted. Thus
was laid open the leading principle of a machine the most powerful, the most
regular, and the most ingenious, ever invented by man.
Watt constructed a model, the cylinder of which was
nine inches diameter, making several improvements besides those above alluded
to. He surrounded the cylinder with a casing, the intervening space being
filled with steam to keep the cylinder warm. He also put a cover on the top,
causing the piston rod to move through a hole in it, and the piston was rendered air-tight by being
lubricated with wax and tallow, instead of water as formerly. The model
answered the expectations of the inventor, but in the course of his trials the
beam broke, and he set it aside for some time.
In tracing the progress of improvement in the steam
engine, we have been obliged to pass over some incidents in his life which took
place during the same period, and which we now proceed to notice. In the course
of the year 1763, Mr Watt married his cousin Miss Miller, daughter of the chief
magistrate of Calton, Glasgow; previously to which he removed from his
apartments in the college, and opened a shop in the Saltmarket, opposite St
AndrewÕs Square, for the purpose of carrying on his business as Mathematical
and Philosophical instrument-maker. Here he applied himself occasionally in
making and repairing musical instruments, and made several improvements on the
organ. He afterwards removed to BuchananÕs land in the Trongate, a little west
of the Tontine, and in 1768 he shut shop, and removed to a private house in
King Street, nearly opposite to the Green market. It was not, however, in any
of these residences that the interesting experiments and valuable discoveries
connected with the steam engine were made; the experiments were performed, and
the model erected in the delft work at the Broomielaw quay, in which concern
Watt soon after became a partner, and continued so to the end of his life.
In 1765, Dr Lind brought from India a perspective
machine, invented there by a Mr Hurst, and showed it to his friend Mr Watt,
who, by an ingenious application of the principle of the parallel ruler,
contrived a machine much lighter, and of more easy application. Many of these
machines were made and sent to various parts of the world; and Adams, the
eminent philosophical instrument-maker, copied one of those sent to London, and
made them for sale.
Mr Watt, having relinquished the business of
mathematical instrument-maker, commenced that of civil engineer, and in the
course of 1767, he surveyed the Forth and Clyde canal; but the bill for
carrying on this great and beneficial public work being lost in parliament, his
attention was directed to the superintendence of the Monkland canal, for which
he had previously prepared the estimates and a survey. He likewise surveyed for
the projected canal between Perth and Forfar, as also for the Crinan canal,
which was subsequently executed under the superintendence of Rennie.
In 1773, the importance of an inland navigation in
the northern part of Scotland between the eastern and western seas became so
great, that Mr Watt was employed to make a survey of the Caledonian canal, and
to report on the practicability of connecting that remarkable chain of lakes
and valleys. These surveys he made, and reported so favourably of the
practicability of the undertaking, that it would have been immediately
executed, had not the forfeited lands, from which the funds were to be derived,
been restored to their former proprietors. This great national work was
afterwards executed by Mr Telford, on a more magnificent scale than had
originally been intended.
What Johnson said of Goldsmith may with equal
justice be applied to Watt, "he touched not that which he did not
adorn." In the course of his surveys, his mind was ever bent on improving
the instruments he employed, or in inventing others to facilitate or correct
his operations. During the period of which we have been speaking he invented
two micrometers for measuring distances not easily accessible, such as arms of
the sea. Five years after the invention of these ingenious instruments, one Mr
Green obtained a premium for an invention similar to one of them, from the Society
of Arts, notwithstanding the evidence of Smeaton and other roofs that Watt was
the original contriver.
Mr Watt applied for letters patent in 1768, for
"methods of lessening the consumption of steam and consequently of fuel in
the steam engine," which passed the seals in January 1769. Besides the
improvements, or rather inventions already alluded to, this patent contained in
its specification methods to employ the steam expansively upon the piston, and
where water was not plentiful, to work the engine by this force of steam only,
by discharging the steam into the open air after it has done its office, and
also methods of forming a rotatory steam engine. Thus was completed Watts
single reciprocating engine and while the patent was passing through the different
stages an engagement was entered into between the inventor and Dr Roebuck of
the Carron iron works, a man equally eminent for kindness of heart, ability,
and enterprise. The terms of this agreement were, that Dr Roebuck, in
consideration of his risk of capital, should receive two-thirds of the clear
profits of the sale of the engines which they manufactured. Dr Roebuck at this
time rented the large coal mines at Kinneil, near Borrowstownness, and under
the superintendence of Mr Watt an engine was erected at Kinneil house, the
cylinder of which was made of block tin, being eighteen inches diameter. The
action of this engine far surpassed even the sanguine expectations of the
proprietors. Preparations were accordingly made for the manufacture of the new steam
engine; but the pecuniary difficulties in which Dr Roebuck became at this time
involved, threw a check on the proceedings. From this period till the end of
1773, during which time, as we have
seen, Mr Watt was employed in surveys, &c., little was done with the patent
right obtained in 1769. About the end of the year 1773, while Mr Watt was
engaged in his survey of the Caledonian canal, he received intimation from
Glasgow of the death of his wife, who left him a son and a daughter.
His fame as an engineer had now become generally
known, and about the commencement of 1774, he received an invitation from Mr
Matthew Boulton, of the Soho foundery, near Birmingham, to enter into
copartnership, for the manufacture of the steam engine. Mr Watt prevailed upon Dr
Roebuck to sell his share of the patent right to Mr Boulton, and immediately
proceeded to Birmingham, and entered on business with his new partner. This new
alliance was not only exceedingly fortunate for the parties themselves, but
forms an important era in the history of the manufactures of Great Britain. Few
men were so well qualified as Boulton to appreciate the merits of WattÕs
inventions, or possessed of so much enterprise and capital to put them into
operation. He had already established the foundery at Soho on a scale of
magnificence and extent, not at that time elsewhere to be found; and the
introduction of Watt made an incalculable addition to the extent and regularity
of its operation.
The length of time and great outlay necessary for
bringing the manufacture of steam engines to such a state as would yield a
remuneration, was now apparent to Mr Watt, and he clearly saw that the few
years of his patent which had yet to run, would not be by any means sufficient
to yield an adequate return. Early, therefore, in 1774, he applied for an
extension of his patent right, and by the zealous assistance of Drs Roebuck and
Robison, he obtained this four years afterwards, the extension being granted
for twenty-five years. The year following the first application for the
extension of the patent, the manufacture of steam engines was commenced at
Soho, under the firm Boulton, Watt, and Co. Many engines were made at this
foundery, and licenses granted to miners in various parts of the country to use
their engines, on condition that the patentees should receive a third part of
the saving of coals of the new engine, compared with one of the same power on
NewcomenÕs construction. An idea may be formed of the profits arising by this
arrangement, when we know that from the proprietors of three large engines
erected at Chacewater in Cornwall, Watt and Boulton received £800 annually.
John Smeaton had for many years been employed in
erecting and improving the steam engine on NewcomenÕs principle, and did as
much for its perfection as beauty and proportion of mechanical construction
could effect. The fame of Smeaton does not rest on his improvements on the
steam engine. What he has done in other departments of engineering, is amply
sufficient to rank him as one of the most ingenious men England ever produced.
Yet even what he has left behind him, in the improvement of NewcomenÕs engine,
is well worthy the study, and will ever elicit the admiration of the practical
mechanic. To a man of weaker mind than Smeaton, it must have been galling to
see all the ingenuity and application which he had bestowed on the subject of
steam power, rendered almost useless by the discovery of a younger man. Yet
when he saw WattÕs improvement, he was struck with its excellence and
simplicity, and with that readiness and candour which are ever the associates
of true genius, he communicated to Mr Watt, by a complimentary letter, the high
opinion he held of his invention; admitting that "the old engine, even
when made to do its best, was now driven from every place, where fuel could be
considered of any value." How different this from the treatment he
received from inferior individuals, labouring in the same field! His right to
the invention of a separate condenser, was disputed by several, whose claims were
publicly and satisfactorily refuted. Among others, he was attacked in a strain
of vulgar abuse, amid a tissue of arrant falsehoods, by a Mr Hornblower, who
wrote the article "Steam Engine," in the first and second editions of
GregoryÕs Mechanics. This Mr Hornblower, not contented with giving his own
shallow evidence against Watt, has, with the characteristic grovelling which
pervades the whole of his article, endeavoured to give weight to his
assertions, by associating with himself a respectable man. Mr Hornblower
states, that, in a conversation with Mr S. Moor, secretary to the Society for
the Encouragement of Arts, that gentleman had stated that Mr Gainsborough was
the true inventor of the separate condenser. Mr Moor had doubtless an intimate
knowledge of the true state of the matter; and, fortunately for his reputation
as a sincere and candid man, we find him controvert this upon oath, at his
examination in the case, Watt and Boulton versus Bull, in 1792.
In 1775, Mr Watt married, for the second time. The
lady, Miss MÕGregor, was the daughter of Mr MÕGregor, a wealthy merchant of
Glasgow, who, as will be seen hereafter, was the first in Britain, in
conjunction with Mr Watt, to apply chlorine in the process of bleaching. From
this time, Watt applied himself assiduously to the improvement of that powerful
machine for which he had already done so much. In 1781, he took out a patent
for the regulating motion, and that beautiful contrivance, the sun and planet
wheel. The short history of this latter invention, gives an apt illustration of
his exhaustless powers of contrivance. For the purpose of converting the
reciprocating motion of the large beam into a rotatory movement for driving
machinery, he had recourse to that simple contrivance, the crank; but while it
was preparing at Soho, one of the workmen communicated it to Mr Steed, who
immediately took out a patent, and thus frustrated WattÕs views. Mr Watt
bethought himself of a substitute, and hit upon the happy idea of the sun and
planet wheel. This and the like occurrences may have given him that fondness
for patents, with which he has frequently been charged.
During the course of the following year, two
distinct patents were granted to Mr Watt, one in February, and the other in
July, for an expansive engineÑsix contrivances for regulating the motionÑdouble
acting engineÑtwo cylinders--parallel motion, by rack and sectorÑsemirotative
engine--and steam wheel. A third was granted in 1784, for a rotative
engineÑparallel motionsÑportable engine and steam carriage--working
hammers--improved hand gear, and new method of working the valves. The most
important of these inventions are, the double acting engine, in which steam is
admitted both below and above the piston alternately, steam pressure being thus
employed to press on each side of the piston, while a vacuum was formed over
the other. By this contrivance, he was enabled to double the power of the
engine, without increasing the dimensions of the cylinder. To the complete effecting of this, he
was obliged to cause the piston rod to move through a stuffing box at the top
of the cylinder; a contrivance, it must be stated, which had been some years
previous applied by Smeaton, in the construction of pumps. Simple as these
additions may at first appear, they were, nevertheless, followed by many great
advantages. They increased the uniformity of motion, and at the same time
diminished the extent of cooling surface, the size of boiler, and the weight
and magnitude of the whole machinery. Another vast improvement involved in
these patents, is the expansive engine in which the steam was let fully in, at
the beginning of the stroke, and the valves shut, when the piston had advanced
through a part of its progress, the rest being completed by the expansion of
the steam; which arrangement greatly increases the power. This engine was
included in the patent for 1782; though Mr Hornblower had published something
of the same nature the year before. But an engine on the expansive principle
was erected by Watt at Shadwell iron works in 1778, and even two years before
expansive engines had been manufactured at Soho; facts which secure to Watt the
honour of the priority of discovery. That ingenious combination of levers which
guided the piston rod, and is called the parallel motion, was secured by patent
of 1784, and remains to this day unsurpassed as a beautifully simple mechanical
contrivance.
In 1785, a patent was granted to Mr Watt for a new
method of constructing furnaces, and the consumption of smoke. He likewise
applied to the steam engine the governor, or conical pendulum, the steam and
condension gauges, and the indicator. About the same time, in consequence of
the delay and expense attendant on the numerous experiments towards the
perfection of this vast creator and distributor of power, he found it necessary
to apply to parliament for an extension of his patent, which was granted to the
end of the eighteenth century. By this grant, the proprietors of the Soho
foundery were enabled speedily to realize a great fortune.
In the winter of the year 1786,the subject of this
memoir, together with his able and active partner, went to Paris, at the
solicitation of the French government, in order to improve the method of
raising water at Marley. Here Mr Watt met with most of the eminent men of
science, who at that time adorned the French metropolis; and among the rest,
the celebrated chemist, Berthollet. The French philosopher had discovered, in
1785, the bleaching properties of chlorine, and communicated the fact to Mr
Watt, with the power of patenting the invention in England. This Mr Watt
modestly declined doing, on the ground that he was not the author of the
discovery. Mr Watt saw the value of this new process, and communicated the
matter, through the course of the following year, to his father-in-law, Mr
MÕGregor, who at that time carried on a large bleaching establishment in the
vicinity of Glasgow. He sent an account of the process, together with some of
the bleaching liquor, in March, 1787; and the process of bleaching by the new method
was immediately commenced at Mr MÕGregorÕs field, and five hundred pieces were
speedily executed to entire satisfaction. Early in the following year, two
foreigners made an attempt to gain a patent for the new bleaching process; but
they were opposed by Mr Watt, and Messrs Cooper and Henry of Manchester, all of
whom had already bleached by BertholletÕs method. Notwithstanding the
misrepresentations in several histories of bleaching, it is manifest from these
facts as well as from the dates of several letters of Mr Watt and Mr Henry,
that the great improver of the steam engine, had also the honour of introducing
the process of bleaching by chlorine into Great Britain; and though he was not
the original discoverer, yet he greatly simplified and economised the process
of obtaining the discharging agent employed, and the vessels and other
arrangements used in the art of bleaching. Among other improvements may be
mentioned, his method of testing the strength of the chlorine liquor, by
ascertaining how much of it is necessary to discharge the colour of a given
quantity of infusion of cochineal. The benefits which Mr Watt conferred on
chemical science, did not terminate here. From a letter written to Dr Priestley
in 1783, and in another to M. De Luc, in the same year, he communicated his
important discovery of the composition of water. But in the beginning of the
following year, Mr Cavendish read a paper on the same subject, claiming to
himself the honour of discovery; and in the histories of chemistry, the claims
of Cavendish are silently admitted. There is a confusion of dates in the
documents on this subject, which at the present day it is impossible to
reconcile; but from the characters of the two men, we are inclined to think
that each made the discovery independently of the other, and that therefore the
credit is due to both. Mr WattÕs letter to M. De Luc was read before the Royal
Society, and published in their Transactions for 1784, under the title of
"Thoughts on the Constituent parts of Water, and of Dephlogisticated Air;
with an Account of some Experiments on that subject." Mr Watt also
contributed a paper on the medical properties and application of the factitious
airs, to the treatise of Dr Beddoes on pneumatic medicine, and continued during
the latter period of his life deeply to engage himself in chemical pursuits.
A patent was granted to Mr Watt in 1780, for a
machine for copying letters and drawings. This machine, which soon became well
known, and extensively used, was manufactured by Messrs Boulton and Kier, under
the firm of James Watt and Company. He was led to this invention, from a desire
to abridge the time necessarily spent in taking copies of the numerous letters
he was obliged to write. It was constructed in two forms, on the principle of the
rolling press, one of them being large, and fitted for offices; the other
light, and capable of being inclosed in a portable writing desk. Through the
course of the following year, Mr Watt invented a steam drying apparatus, for
his friend, Mr MÕGregor, of Glasgow. For this machine he never took out a
patent, although it was the first thing of the kind ever contrived; nor was
there ever any drawing or description of it published during his lifetime. [See
Edinburgh Encyc., xviii., Steam Drying.] During the winter of 1784, Mr Watt
made arrangements for heating his study by steam; which method has since been
extensively applied to the heating of private houses, conservatories,
hot-houses, and manufactories. Concerning the history of this apparatus, it is
but justice to state, that colonel Cook had, in the Philosophical Transactions
for 1745, described a method of "heating apartments by means of the steam
of water conveyed along the walls by pipes;" but there is no proof that
this was known to Mr Watt.
In the year 1800, Mr Watt withdrew from the concern
at Soho, delivering his share of the business to his two sons, James and
Gregory, the latter of whom died in the prime of life, much regretted by all
who knew him. After having given ample proofs of great mental endowments Mr
Watt thus retired from business, with a well earned competency, which enabled
him to enjoy the evening of a well spent life with ease and comfort in the
bosom of his family. At no time had he taken any active share in the management
of the business of the Soho foundery, nor were his visits to it, even while he
was a partner, by any means frequent. Mr Boulton was a man of excellent
address, great wealth, of business habits, and full of enterprise, and
contributed greatly to the improvement of the steam engine, by taking upon
himself the entire management of the works at Soho: he thus relieved from all
worldly concern, the mind of his illustrious partner, which was much more
profitably employed on those profound and valuable researches, by which he has
added so largely to the field of science. As Dupin well observes, "men who
devote themselves entirely to the improvement of industry, will feel in all
their force the services that Boulton has rendered to the arts and mechanical
sciences, by freeing the genius of Watt from a crowd of extraneous difficulties
which would have consumed those days that were far better dedicated to the
improvement of the useful arts."
Although Mr Watt retired from public business, he
did not relax in his ardour for scientific pursuits and new inventions. Towards
the end of the year 1809, he was applied to by the Glasgow Water Company to
assist them in pointing out a method of leading water across the river, from a
well on the south side, which afforded a natural filter. From a consideration
of the structure of the lobsterÕs tail, he formed the idea of a flexible main,
with ball and socket joints, to be laid across the bed of the river, and which
was constructed according to his plan in the summer of 1810. This ingenious contrivance
gave such satisfaction, that another precisely similar was added a short time
afterwards. Two years subsequent to this, he received the thanks of the Board
of Admiralty, for his opinion and advice regarding the formation of the docks
then carrying on at Sheerness.
About the year 1813, it was proposed to publish a
complete edition of Dr RobisonÕs works, and the materials were delivered, for
the purpose of editing, into the hands of his able friend, Playfair, who, not
having sufficient leisure for such an undertaking, transmitted them to Sir D.
Brewster. The latter gentleman applied to Mr Watt for his assistance in the
revision of the article "Steam Engine," for which article he had
originally furnished some materials, when it first appeared in the Encyclopedia
Britannica; and to the article, in its new form, he furnished many valuable
corrections and additions.
In 1817, Mr Watt paid a visit to his native
country; and it surprised and delighted his friends to find that he enjoyed
good health, his mind possessed its wonted vigour, and his conversation its
wonted charms. During the last years of his life, he employed himself in
contriving a machine for taking copies of pieces of sculpture. This machine
never received the finishing touch of its inventorÕs hand; but it was brought
to such perfection, that seven specimens were executed by it in a very
creditable manner. Some of these he distributed among his friends, "as the
productions of a young artist, just entering his eighty-third year." When
this machine was considerably advanced in construction, Mr Watt learned that a
neighbouring gentleman had been for some time engaged in a similar undertaking;
and a proposal was made to Mr Watt, that they should jointly take out a patent,
which he declined, on the ground, that from his advanced age, it would be
unwise for him to enter upon any new speculation. It was always Mr WattÕs
opinion that this gentleman had no knowledge whatever of the construction of the
machine.
The health of Mr Watt, which was naturally
delicate, became gradually better towards the latter period of his long and
useful life. Intense headaches arising from an organic defect in the digestive
system, often afflicted him. These were often aggravated and induced by the
severe study to which be commonly subjected himself, and the perplexity arising
from the frequent lawsuits in which he had been engaged towards the close of
the eighteenth century. It must not be inferred from this last statement, that
this great man, whose discoveries we have been recounting, was by any means
litigiously inclined. His quiet and peaceful mind was ever disposed to shrink
from the agitations of paper wars and law pleas, and to repose in the quiet
retreats of science. Many attempts were made to pirate his inventions and to
encroach upon his patent rights, against which he never made any other defence
than that which become an honest man, i. e. an appeal for the protection of the law of the land. He
lived to see all these attempts to rob him of the profits of his inventions, as well as the envy and detraction
which are ever the followers of merit, silenced for ever, and terminated a
long, useful, and honourable life in the full possession of his mental
faculties, at his residence at Heathfield in Staffordshire, on the 25th of
August, 1819, having reached his eighty-fourth year.
The fame of Watt will in future ages rest secure
upon the imperishable basis of his many discoveries, and he will ever be ranked
in the first class of those great men who have benefited the human race by the
improvement of the arts of industry and peace. Even during his lifetime this
was known and recognized, and he received several honorary distinctions. In
1784, he was elected a fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and the year
following he became fellow of
the Royal Society of London. In 1787, he was chosen corresponding member of the
Batavian Society; in 1806, he received the honorary degree of LL.D. from the
university of Glasgow; and ten years later, he was made a member of the
national institute of France.
Respecting the private character of Watt it would
be difficult to communicate an adequate idea of its excellence. Those who knew
him will ever remember that in his private intercourse with society he elicited
from them more love and admiration than they can ever express. He was benevolent and
kind to all those who came about him, or solicited either his patronage or
advice. His conversation was easy, fluent, and devoid of all formality; replete
with profound and accurate information on all subjects, blended with pertinent
and amusing anecdoteÑsuch that, when combined with big plain unaffected
language, the mellow tones of his manly voice, his natural good humour and
expressive countenance, produced an effect on those around him which will
hardly ever fade from memory. He read much, and could easily remember and
readily apply all that was valuable of what he read. He was versed in several
of the modern languages, antiquities, law, and the fine arts, and was largely
read in light literature. His character was drawn up by his friend Francis
Jeffrey, with a fidelity and eloquence that has made it known to almost every one. We
will, therefore, forbear to quote it here, and bring this memoir to a
conclusion by placing before the reader what has been said of Watt by his
illustrious countryman and friend, the author of Waverley. In the playful
letter to captain Clutterbuck in the introduction to the Monastery, Sir Walter
Scott gives the following lively description of his meeting in Edinburgh with
this remarkable man:Ñ"Did you know the celebrated Watt of Birmingham,
captain Clutterbuck? I believe not, though, from what I am about to state, he
would not have failed to have sought an acquaintance with you. It was only once
my fortune to meet him, whether in body or in spirit it matters not. There were
assembled about half a score of our northern lights, who had amongst them,
heaven knows how, a well known character of your country, Jedediah Cleishbotham. This worthy person having
come to Edinburgh during the Christmas vacation, had become a sort of lion in
the place, and was led in leash from house to house along with the guizzards,
the stone eater, and other amusements of the season, which Ôexhibit their
unparalleled feats to private family parties, if required.Õ Amidst this company
stood Mr Watt, the man whose genius discovered the means of multiplying our
national resources to a degree perhaps even beyond his own stupendous powers of
calculation and combination, bringing the treasures of the abyss to the summit
of the earth; giving the feeble arm of man the momentum of an Afrite;
commanding manufactures to arise, as the rod of the prophet produced water in
the desert; affording the means of dispensing with that time and tide which
wait for no man, and of sailing without that wind which defied the commands and
threats of Xerxes himself. This potent commander of the elementsÑthis abridger
of time and spaceÑthis magician, whose cloudy machinery has produced a change
on the world, the effects of which, extraordinary as they are, are perhaps only
now beginning to be feltÑwas not only the most profound man of science, the
most successful combiner of powers and calculator of numbers, as adapted to
practical purposesÑwas not only one of the most generally well informed, but
one of the best and kindest of human beings.
"There he stood, surrounded by the little band
I have mentioned of northern literati, men not less tenacious, generally
speaking, of their own fame and their own opinions than the national regiments
are supposed to be jealous of the high character which they have gained upon
service. Methinks I yet see and hear what I shall never see and hear again. In
his eighty-fifth year, the alert, kind, benevolent old man had his attention at
every oneÕs question, his information at every oneÕs command. His talents and
fancy overflowed on every subject. One gentleman was a deep philologist; he
talked with him on the origin of the alphabet as if he had been coeval with
Cadmus: another was a celebrated critic; you would have said the old man had
studied political economy and belles lettres all his life; of science it is
unnecessary to speak, it was his own distinguished walk. And yet, captain
Clutterbuck, when he spoke with your countryman, Jedediah Cleishbotham, you
would have sworn he had been coeval with Claverse and Burley, with the
persecutors and persecuted, and could number every shot the dragoons had fired
at the fugitive Covenanters. In fact, we discovered that no novel of the least
celebrity escaped his perusal, and that the gifted man of science was as much
addicted to the productions of your native country, (the land of Utopia
aforesaid;) in other words, as shameless and obstinate a peruser of novels as
if he had been a very millinerÕs apprentice of eighteen."
A highly characteristic statue of Watt, by Chantrey, adorns a Gothic monument reared to his memory, by his son, Mr James Watt, who died June 2, 1848, in his 80th year. Three other statues of him by Chantrey have been erectedÑ one of them, of colossal size, stands in Westminster Abbey, and bears an elegant inscription by lord Brougham. The countenance of this statue has been characterised as the personification of abstract thought. Glasgow possesses the other twoÑone of marble, in the museum of the university, and the other of bronze, in GeorgeÕs Square. His native town of Greenock has also rendered appropriate homage to his genius, by erecting not only his statue but a public library, which bears his name. An admirable Eloge on Watt and his inventions was pronounced before the National Institute of France by the late M. Arago. Lord Brougham has also celebrated his merits in his Historical Account of the Composition of Water, which is published as an appendix to the Eloge.